Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Training Program Evaluation Model Krikpatrick

Authors

  • Mutmainnah Sukeriyadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sutan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
  • Zurqoni Universitas Islam Negeri Sutan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
  • Sugeng Universitas Mulawarman Samarinda

Keywords:

educational program evaluation, kirkpatrick model, human resource development

Abstract

Evaluation of education and training programs is a crucial aspect of human resource development. This program discusses the use of the Kirkpatrick Model in Training Program Evaluation (TPE) within the context of the Substantive Religious Moderation Technical Training Batch I in 2019. The objective of this training is to enhance the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the participants. The target of this training is Civil Servant Religious Counselors in South Sulawesi, West Sulawesi, North Sulawesi, and Central Sulawesi. The program also discusses assessment instruments from superiors, peers, and trainers towards the alumni of the training, as well as the results of data analysis showing a positive impact on the performance of the alumni. Additionally, the document discusses training evaluation models such as the Kirkpatrick model, which provides a framework for measuring the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of training programs. This model has four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results/outcomes, which help organizations collect data, analyze results, and make appropriate decisions to optimize training strategies. The program also addresses the strengths and weaknesses of TPE using the Kirkpatrick model and concludes with the importance of evaluating educational programs. Educational program evaluation helps organizations determine the benefits of the program for participants and the organization as a whole. Training Program Evaluation is essential to ensure the program provides benefits for participants and the organization. Thus, it will provide a comprehensive understanding of educational and training program evaluation, with an emphasis on the importance of evaluation to ensure the program's benefits for participants and the organization as a whole.

References

Abdillah, Fazli, dkk. (2023). Strategi Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Terhadap Kualitas Belajar Siswa Di Sekolah.Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia (JUBPI) Vol. 1, No. 2 Mei e-ISSN: 2963-4768; p-ISSN: 2963- 5934.

Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Medan: Perdana Publishing.

Anwar Muh, dkk. 2023. Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick Pada Program Pelatihan Teknik Terhadap Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SMP, Educational Leadership Volume 3, No.1

Arikunto Suharsimi. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, I. (2019). Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model on Civil Servant Training (Case Study of Financial Education and Training Agency of Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20(1), 18–19.

Djuanda, I. (2020). Implementasi Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process Dan Output). Al Amin: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Budaya Islam, 3(01), Article 01. https://doi.org/10.36670/alamin.v3i1.39.

Djuanda, Isep. (2020). Implementasi Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter Model Cipp (Context, Input, Process Dan Output). Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Budaya Islam. P-ISSN: 2088-7981 Vol. 3, No. 1, E-ISSN: 2685-1148.

Evans, W. N., Kearney, M. S., Perry, B., & Sullivan, J. X. (2020). Increasing Community College Completion Rates Among Low-Income Students: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of a Case-Management Intervention. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(4), 930–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22256.

Halpin, J. G., Glennelle Halpin, Gerald. (2007). Retaining Black Students in Engineering: Do Minority Programs Have a Longitudinal Impact Dalam Minority Student Retention. Routledge.

Khosyiin, M. I., & Fakhruddin, M. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Model Kirkpatrick. Cermin: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Berbasis Islam Nusantara, 1(2), 42–46. https://ejournal.staida-krempyang.ac.id/index.php/CERMIN

Kirkpatrick, Donald L. (2006). Implementing The Four Levels. San Fransisco: Berret-Koehler Publisher, Inc.

Madi, M., Hadi Widodo, Y. S., Tuswan, T., & Ismail, A. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Peserta Pelatihan AutoCAD Online untuk Pengabdian Masyarakat Terdampak Covid-19 dengan Metode Kirkpatrick Level I. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 5(4), 1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.30653/002.202054.689.

Mustafa, Pinton Setya. (2021). Model Discrepancy Sebagai Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal Studi Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Volume 9, Nomor 1, Mei ; p-ISSN 2338- 2325; e-ISSN 2540-9697; 182-198

Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H., & Wholey, J. (2015). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. New Jersey: Jossey Bas.

Rahmadani. (2022). Effectiveness of Long-Distance Training Using. 12 Waiheru, volume. 8

Siswanto dan Eli Susanti. (2019). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Paramurobi, Vol. 2, No. 1, Januari-Juni. ISSN : 2615-5680

Sudrajat, Akhmad. (2008). "Pengertian pendekatan, strategi, metode, teknik, taktik, dan model pembelajaran." Online)(http://smacepiring. wordpress. com).

Suparno, Sirajuddin, S, Z., & Suradi. (2023). Evaluasi Program Magang dengan Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick. Joeao (Journal of Education and Instruction), Volume 6.

Tamsuri, A. (2022). Literatur Review Penggunaan Metode Kirkpatrick untuk Evaluasi Pelatihan di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(8), 2723–2734. https://stp-mataram.e-journal.id/JIP/article/view/1154/879.

Tobin, T. J., Mandernach, B., & Taylor , A. (2015). Evaluating Online Teaching: Implementing Best Practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Vanderstoep, S. W., & Johnston, D. (2009). Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Yusuf, M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Downloads

Published

12.06.2024

How to Cite

Sukeriyadi, M., Zurqoni, & Sugeng. (2024). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Training Program Evaluation Model Krikpatrick. NABAWI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 101–117. Retrieved from https://ejournal.stitsyambtg.ac.id/index.php/nabawi/article/view/68

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): NABAWI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam

Section

Articles

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Mutmainnah Sukeriyadi, Zurqoni, Sugeng (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. This means that the journal has the initial privilege of publishing the work, and concurrently, the authors license the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License.