Ethical Publication Statement

Our editors and staff are dedicated to maintaining ethical standards in the content we publish. In pursuit of this objective, we diligently adhere to the guidance provided in the guidelines and flowcharts available on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) website.

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

Nabawi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam (NJPPI) is a scholarly periodical that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, wherein other experts (peer reviewers) evaluate the article's merit and credibility before it is published. This journal is dedicated to disseminating scientific articles on the study of Islamic education, covering various aspects and perspectives as well as predetermined themes. Published biannually, in August and February, NJPPI aspires to be a prominent platform for researchers to share ideas and findings in the field of Islamic education. Furthermore, it aims to serve as a significant reference in the same domain. NJPPI is committed to upholding high ethical standards in scientific publication, encompassing peer review, authorship, journal editing, and publishing. This commitment is grounded in the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

 

ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL PUBLICATION

The publication of an article in Nabawi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam (NJPPI) is a crucial element in establishing a cohesive and reputable knowledge network. It serves as a direct reflection of the authors' work quality and the supporting institutions. Peer-reviewed articles uphold and embody scientific methodologies. Therefore, it is imperative to establish standards for expected ethical conduct for all parties involved in the publishing process: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of Nabawi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam (NJPPI), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Syamsul Ma’arif Bontang East Kalimantan, Indonesia, takes its responsibilities for overseeing all publication stages seriously and acknowledges its ethical and other duties. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Syamsul Ma’arif Bontang East Kalimantan, Indonesia, is dedicated to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial aspects have no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication Decisions

The editorial team of Nabawi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam (NJPPI) holds the responsibility for determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication. Decisions are driven by the validation of the work's significance to researchers and readers. The editors adhere to the policies set by the journal's editorial board and comply with legal requirements, including those related to libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Consultation with other editors or reviewers may be sought in the decision-making process.Top of Form

Plagiarism Screening

It is the responsibility of the author to submit a manuscript that is entirely free from plagiarism and academic misconduct. The editor, in turn, conducts a thorough examination of each article before its publication. This involves the initial step of checking for plagiarism against an offline database created by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Syamsul Ma’arif Bontang East Kalimantan, Indonesia, followed by a secondary check against various online databases.

Fair Play

At all times, an editor evaluates manuscripts based on their intellectual content, disregarding factors such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

Editors and all editorial staff are required to maintain strict confidentiality regarding any details concerning a submitted manuscript. This information should only be shared with the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as deemed appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Any unpublished materials revealed in a submitted manuscript cannot be utilized in the editors' own research without obtaining explicit written consent from the author.

 

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The role of peer reviewers is to contribute to the editorial decision-making process. Through communication with the authors, the peer review not only aids editors in making decisions but also helps authors enhance the paper's overall quality.

Promptness

Reviewers chosen for a manuscript should promptly assess their qualifications to evaluate the research or notify the editors if they anticipate any challenges in providing a timely review. If a selected referee feels unqualified or foresees difficulties in prompt reviewing, they should inform the editors and withdraw from the review process.

Top of Form

Confidentiality

All manuscripts submitted for review must be treated as confidential materials and should not be disclosed or discussed with unauthorized individuals, except as permitted by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews must be conducted in an objective manner, avoiding personal criticism of the author. Referees are expected to present their opinions clearly, supported by relevant arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers are responsible for identifying pertinent published works that have not been referenced by the authors. Any claim that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously documented should be accompanied by an appropriate citation. Reviewers should also bring to the editors' attention any significant similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper within their personal knowledge.Top of Form

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Information or ideas acquired during the peer review process should be treated as confidential and not exploited for personal gain. Reviewers must refrain from evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other associations with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Review Process

Each manuscript submitted to Nabawi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam (NJPPI) undergoes an independent review conducted by a minimum of two reviewers in the form of a "double-blind review." The decision regarding publication, revision, or rejection is based on their respective reports and recommendations. In specific instances, the editor may seek the input of an additional, third reviewer before reaching a decision, if deemed necessary.Top of Form

 

DUTIES OF AUTHORS

Reporting Standards

Authors who report original research must provide a precise record of the conducted work, accompanied by an unbiased discussion of its importance. The underlying data must be accurately presented in the paper, with sufficient details and references to enable replication. Engaging in fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate practices and making statements of this nature is considered unethical and unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors are responsible for ensuring that their works are entirely original. If authors incorporate the ideas or words of others, proper citation or quotation must be employed to acknowledge the source.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

In general, an author should refrain from publishing manuscripts that essentially describe the same research in multiple journals or primary publications. Submitting the identical manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is considered unethical publishing behavior and is not acceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Authors are obligated to provide proper acknowledgment for the work of others. It is essential to cite publications that have significantly influenced the nature of the reported work.Top of Form

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be restricted to individuals who have made noteworthy contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research. All those who have made substantial contributions should be recognized as co-authors. If there are individuals who have participated in specific substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring the inclusion of all appropriate co-authors and the exclusion of inappropriate co-authors. Additionally, the corresponding author must confirm that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the paper and have consented to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Authors are required to disclose any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest in their manuscript that could potentially influence the results or interpretation. The project's sources of financial support should also be disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

If an author identifies a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their duty to promptly inform the journal editor or publisher and collaborate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.